May 28 , 2004 Volume 4 Number 3

U.S. Trade Remedy Laws: Consumers are Collateral Damage
Would you support a flawed law simply because a bad law is better than none? Wouldn't it make more sense to refine and improve that law? When dealing with our country's antidumping and countervailing duty laws, many officials in our government strangely enough think not. In a May 11th panel discussion hosted by CWT, it became disturbingly clear that while trade remedy laws inflict pain on thousands of downstream consuming industries in the United States, their employees, and their customers, some in Congress and the Administration trivialize the harm as "collateral damage," a price consumers should be willing to pay so that our government can avoid the difficult business of trade reform. Read more about trade remedies…

Line Up for Higher Prices on Consumer Goods
Various U.S. corporate interests are lining up to use U.S. trade laws to limit competition and hit you where you live -- right in your pocketbook. Read about how these trade laws are being used to increase consumer prices and eliminate product choice.

What the U.S.- Australia FTA Means for U.S. Consumers
The next time you wash down your roast lamb with a delicious Australian Shiraz, your bill may be lower thanks to the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), which was recently signed by President Bush for congressional consideration. Click here to read how else the AUSFTA will benefit American consumers…

Bush Says "No" to the AFL-CIO on China Labor Practices
Consumers for World Trade applauds the Administration for its recent decision to reject a request by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) that would have used our trade remedy laws to challenge Chinese labor practices. Read more about this unprecedented case and why the administration did the right thing.

CWT in the News

Read Previous Newsletters