
May 28 , 2004 Volume 4 Number 3
U.S. Trade Remedy Laws:
Consumers are Collateral Damage
Would you support a flawed law simply because a bad law is better than none?
Wouldn't it make more sense to refine and improve that law? When dealing with
our country's antidumping and countervailing duty laws, many officials in
our government strangely enough think not. In a May 11th panel discussion
hosted by CWT, it became disturbingly clear that while trade remedy laws inflict
pain on thousands of downstream consuming industries in the United States,
their employees, and their customers, some in Congress and the Administration
trivialize the harm as "collateral damage," a price consumers should
be willing to pay so that our government can avoid the difficult business
of trade reform. Read more about
trade remedies
Line Up for Higher Prices on Consumer Goods
Various U.S. corporate
interests are lining up to use U.S. trade laws to limit competition and hit
you where you live -- right in your pocketbook. Read
about how these trade laws are being used to increase consumer prices and
eliminate product choice.
What the U.S.- Australia
FTA Means for U.S. Consumers
The next time you
wash down your roast lamb with a delicious Australian Shiraz, your bill may
be lower thanks to the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), which
was recently signed by President Bush for congressional consideration. Click
here to read how else the AUSFTA will benefit American consumers
Bush Says "No"
to the AFL-CIO on China Labor Practices
Consumers for World Trade applauds the Administration for its recent decision
to reject a request by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial
Organizations (AFL-CIO) that would have used our trade remedy laws to challenge
Chinese labor practices. Read more
about this unprecedented case and why the administration did the right thing.
CWT in the News